In a world of instant messaging and the
land of ubiquitous social media, an off-handed remark can be broadcast to
thousands – perhaps millions of people.
Urged by the goal of expanding those who know and understand the importance
of routine philanthropy in their lives, our community foundation, The LegacyFund, has started a program to make full use of the array of these modern
communication tools including Facebook, Twitter, blogs, and LinkedIn. Mostly Legacy Fund posts photos of local
events and heroes along with the occasional notice of some piece designed to
inspire giving. Yet when reposting a story from the Wall Street Journal which
innocuously enough supported corporate philanthropy, a far-away reader jumped
into the fray with a stinging assessment of the purported generosity of the
business leaders who give. Now, it seems
that one can, at the push of an all-too-easy button on the handy cell phone,
post each fragment of thought.
If a basic tenant of public discourse is to
“know one’s audience,” then the open nature of the World Wide Web is antithetical
to this objective. Once posted,
information is impossible to control and contain yet entirely easy to
contort. This week, filmmaker Spike Lee
Tweeted online to millions the address of the shooter of the young boy in
Florida. Unfortunately, Mr. Lee had an
address for the wrong people. Thereafter,
these folks have been receiving death threats and are in hiding for fear of their
family’s safety. Should Mr. Lee be held
to account for inciting vigilantism? Or,
was his a simple misspeak amplified by the megaphone provided by social
media? Regardless, it is clear that
these, like any powerful tools, are inherently dangerous and must be treated
with special care. Likewise their
irresponsible use can carry great consequence to both user and bystander.
This column was
published on Tuesday, April 9, 2012 in the Current in Carmel, Current in Westfield,
Current in Fishers and Current in Noblesville - http://youarecurrent.com/
Amen, Terry. As a former, early adopter of technology, I see the benefits of the availability of tools on the internet to improve one's effectiveness in a job, or to provide avenues of communication where none existed before. However, I fear that more people, primarily the 'Y' generation and younger, are using technology and social media as a replacement for true social interaction and, thus, have thwarted the development of interpersonal relationships. Facebook is not a substitute for a giving, mutual friendship. Really, can anyone have 600 'friends'?
ReplyDelete